https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3)
> Looks like I missed MIN with literals.
>
> integer(2) :: a2
> integer(4) :: a4
> write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9_1))
> write(*,*) kind(max(7_2, 9))
> write(*,*) kind(max(a2, a4))
> write(*,*) kind(min(7_2, 9))
> write(*,*) kind(min(a2, a4))
> end
>
> gives
>
> 4
> 2
> 4
> 2
> 4
>
> So there is discrepancy between literal parameters and variables for MAX and
> MIN.
That is a bug, IMHO.
In general, I disagree with the statement that a bug can be turned into
a feature by documenting it :-)
