https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89037
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|aarch64 |aarch64 x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2019-01-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
And on x86_64-linux as well. I guess we should use extract_uhwi instead
of TREE_INT_CST_ELT. Oddly enough I need to resort to a widest_int here...
(and more than this single place uses TREE_INT_CST_ELT).
Index: varasm.c
===================================================================
--- varasm.c (revision 268010)
+++ varasm.c (working copy)
@@ -5407,7 +5407,8 @@ output_constructor_bitfield (oc_local_st
= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - (shift & (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT -
1));
/* Now get the bits from the appropriate constant word. */
- value = TREE_INT_CST_ELT (local->val, shift /
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT);
+ value = wi::extract_uhwi (wi::to_widest (local->val),
+ shift, HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT);
shift = shift & (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1);
/* Get the result. This works only when:
