https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88954
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm wondering if noplt is meant to be a property of the function pointer or
that of its type?
Either way, what should happen in cases when a noplt pointer is assigned the
address of a PLT function? E.g.,:
void (*p_noplt)(void) = f_noplt;
void f (int i)
{
if (i < 0)
p_noplt = f_plt;
}
Do calls through p_noplt still happen without the use of the PLT after the
assignment? Should a warning be issued when a noplt pointer is assigned the
address of an ordinary PLT function?
