https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88701
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 45366
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45366&action=edit
gcc9-pr88701.patch
For what I wanted to achieve with that change (i.e. put the compound literal
decls in the block scope they belong to), the following works too; it is fine
if the compound literals in the function parameters are handled as before - in
the scope of the function.
