https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
--- Comment #4 from Sam Tebbs <samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3) > Is the revision number (r260385) really correct? Sorry it was r266385, fixed that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
--- Comment #4 from Sam Tebbs <samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3) > Is the revision number (r260385) really correct? Sorry it was r266385, fixed that now.