https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44313
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1)
> This was addressed as a DR by the C++ committee:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#391 . And of
> course the proposed C++0x standard removes this error. So gcc should only
> give an error with -std=c++98 -pedantic. This is low priority.
Our policy is to implement defect report resolutions in all dialects they apply
to. We don't implement a buggy standard even if you say -std=c++98 -pedantic.
So not a bug.
