https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I disagree, with -Os you want smallest size. Furthermore, the -On level can be
different between different functions within the TU, so it makes sense to
specify some alignment for the non-size optimized functions and let the
implementation do its best for size optimized ones. It isn't unlike that -O0
ignores most of the user specified -fwhatever-optimization explicit options (or
-Og).
