https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So before the patch we were just lucky, right? When seeing the patches I wondered whether we instead want to add a clone_count member to cgraph_node (which we could stream) and use that for the .NUM suffix. We alread have it (sort-of) if we walk the clones list and do counting, right?
