https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88088
--- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7) > The number of targets where such a warning is meaningless is _big_, that is > the point (most of the (older) embedded targets). There are a lot of targets which were once read-implies-exec, but have later implementations which are not. I guess the dealbreaker is whether GCC emits code or markers to make the stack executable. If it does that, it should warn.
