https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44551
--- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Matthias Kretz from comment #20) > The original issue I meant to report is fixed. There are many more missed > optimizations in the original example, though. ok, your choice if you prefer to close it (especially if the other missed optimizations are already tracked in other bugs) or leave it open.
