https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #48 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #47) > Can the bug be marked as resolved? Reading back through the comments, I think that work-arounds were done, but AFAIK neither manual updates, nor fixincludes changes were made; I can add more workarounds to clear the remaining three fails from Darwin9/10 .. (or look at the fixinclude changes). That ought to be feasible in current stage#3.
