https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sergio Losilla from comment #3) > I see, thanks. Well then, I guess I'll stick to the workaround. Good to know > it is already fixed in version 9. Thanks. Next GCC 8.3 will have a workaround, so you won't be forced to update to GCC 9.1. Anyway, thanks for the bug report.
