https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007

--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
> 
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> This is because parse_optimize_options has:
>               r = q = (char *) ggc_alloc_atomic (len2 + 3);
> and constructs in there the whole option, like "-falign-functions=16" , and
> then options processing comes and points arg into that string (so "16").
> As gcc_options is marked GTY, the const char * fields in there thus need to be
> either not GC memory at all, or they need to point at the start of a GC chunk,
> or into the middle of STRING_CST, everything else is disallowed.
> 
> So, either we need to pass down to the option processing info that the options
> are GC allocated and if we'd have arg pointing into the middle of such a
> string, ggc_strdup it, or maybe c-common.c should use XOBNEWVEC 
> (&opts_obstack,
> char, len2 + 3); instead of (char *) ggc_alloc_atomic (len2 + 3) ?

Using the opts_obstack sounds reasonable to me.

Reply via email to