https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60702
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2017-11-15 00:00:00 |2018-10-25
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=81880
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another wrong-code example taken from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2018-10/msg00116.html
class B
{
int* x;
public:
static thread_local B tmp;
B() { x = new int(); }
void f() { *x = 0; }
};
thread_local B B::tmp;
template<class T>
void f()
{
B::tmp.f();
}
void g()
{
B::tmp.f();
}
int main()
{
//g();
f<int>();
}
Unless the non-template g() is called first, the thread_local variable isn't
initialized.