https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- That is still not what I said, so don't pretend I did please. Those are also not false positives: in all these cases, the program does in fact skip some initialisation. But, it seems -Wjump-misses-init is not what you want; you do not want a warning for jumping over initialisers, it warns for a lot of harmless code. What you want is a warning that only warns if the var is (potentially) used without initialisation?
