https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87547
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|i686-linux-gnu |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2018-10-08
Host|i686-linux-gnu |
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=84516
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sandro Boehler from comment #0)
> Expected output (according to standard [class.bit]
> (http://eel.is/c++draft/class.bit): "The bit-field attribute is not part of
> the type of the class member."):
If the bit-field attribute was part of the type then it would be "unsigned
int:4" not "unsigned char" or "unsigned short". But G++ is still wrong to use a
smaller type, it should be unsigned int (even if internally something else is
used).
