https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87486
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Thu Oct 4 15:05:32 2018 New Revision: 264847 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264847&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix expected error output for test case. r264355 removed some spelling suggestions including for "bool" as used in this test case. Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this ok for trunk? 2018-10-04 Bill Seurer <seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR target/87486 * gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c: Fix expected error output. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c (revision 264812) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c (working copy) @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #include <xmmintrin.h> -bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'; did you mean '_Bool'?" } */ +bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'" } */ { return x == 2; } Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c
