https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On i9-7960X I get (cc1 is -O0 checking build, so bootstrapped compiler might be
much faster), will repeat that with bootstrapped compiler if it succeeds. The
__int128 and unsigned __int128 tests are clearly too expensive.
for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6; do time ./cc1 -quiet -O2 -o pr82853-$i.{s,c}; gcc -o
pr82853-$i{,.s}; time ./pr82853-$i; echo $?; done
real 0m11.273s
user 0m11.182s
sys 0m0.039s
real 0m2.997s
user 0m2.993s
sys 0m0.001s
0
real 0m8.145s
user 0m8.082s
sys 0m0.026s
real 0m2.166s
user 0m2.165s
sys 0m0.000s
0
real 0m11.683s
user 0m11.597s
sys 0m0.033s
real 0m5.315s
user 0m5.312s
sys 0m0.000s
0
real 0m7.972s
user 0m7.903s
sys 0m0.032s
real 0m3.801s
user 0m3.798s
sys 0m0.001s
0
real 0m12.846s
user 0m12.762s
sys 0m0.028s
real 0m17.471s
user 0m17.458s
sys 0m0.001s
0
real 0m8.546s
user 0m8.486s
sys 0m0.022s
real 0m13.738s
user 0m13.728s
sys 0m0.000s
