https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17426
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|giovannibajo at gmail dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> (In reply to Giovanni Bajo from comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> >
> > > it's only where an integer constant expression is
> > > required, as in bug 17396 (static array dimension) or for case labels,
> > > enum values, bit-field widths, null pointer constants, designators for
> > > array initializers, that there's a problem.
> >
> > Thanks for the list. I will try to activate the warning in these contexts,
> > but
> > I do not know the C frontend, so maybe I'll need to do this incrementally.
> >
> > > fits the long-established
> > > GCC extension of symbolic difference constant expressions if being used
> > > in
> > > a static initializer
> >
> > This could be a pedwarn, then, right?
>
> Are you still working on this?
No reply; taking that as a no.
