https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80334
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #12) > Created attachment 44527 [details] > candidate patch to fix the error noted in comment 11 > > This patch fixes the unaligned accesses in the testcase in comment 11. I > haven't yet tested it otherwise. The patch doesn't make much sense. Whoever is "consuming" the pointer does the wrong thing. Please open a new bug as well.
