https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86730
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Asif from comment #0)
> gcc (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3) 7.3.0
>
> //Below code does not compile, I am not using the copy constructor
You are using it.
, it seems
> to work fine in Vs2013, CLANG (experimental P1144), tested using
> https://godbolt.org/
>
>
> struct A1{
> A1(int y){}
> A1(const A1 &a1)=delete;
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> A1 a1_=6;
This is copy-initialization, see
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/copy_initialization which explains
that the copy constructor is required to be accessible, even if the actual call
optimised away.
Your code is valid in C++17, but not C++11 or C++14.
