https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2018-07-27 CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks| |26163 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[8/9 Regression] SPEC |[9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 |CPU2006 400.perlbench, |400.perlbench, CPU2017 |CPU2017 500.perlbench_r ~3% |500.perlbench_r ~3% |performance drop after |performance drop after |r262247 |r262247 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thanks for the report, I'll take a look. If it's really caused by the revision, then it's only 9 regression. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 [Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)