https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #44446|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #44447|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #40 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 44452 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44452&action=edit Version 2, create a new label instead of attempting to re-use Trying to re-use the existing cold start labels causes regressions in some targets when the ordering of sections is affected. I'm testing the attached version across a variety of platforms (it's OK on x86-64 Darwin and Linux so far). What this does is to create a new label (in a similar vein to the LFBn label that's generated for the first FDE).