https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #44446|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
  Attachment #44447|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #40 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 44452
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44452&action=edit
Version 2, create a new label instead of attempting to re-use

Trying to re-use the existing cold start labels causes regressions in some
targets when the ordering of sections is affected.

I'm testing the attached version across a variety of platforms (it's OK on
x86-64 Darwin and Linux so far).

What this does is to create a new label (in a similar vein to the LFBn label
that's generated for the first FDE).

Reply via email to