https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
--- Comment #11 from Fredrik Tolf <fredrik at dolda2000 dot com> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > That is, it is reasonable to lose track of z in > > int a = (x + z) + b; > > but only after x + z is computed. Just for the record, I disagree that it's okay to lose z after that. As I explained in #85059, not having access to variable values after they've been consumed is one of the absolute main reasons I never use -Og.
