https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > > We didn't do that in stage1, stage4 is too risky for that. Can somebody > > from Intel try that for GCC9 stage1? > > I'm willing to help, but will have lots of work on OpenMP 5.0, so can't > > drive that. > > We will look into it. Thanks. It's gcc9 stage1 now...
