https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84916
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2018-06-17
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> In
> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/84oizv/usability_improvements_in_gcc_8/dvrdyhv/
> Reddit user "Liorithiel" pointed out:
>
> > Have you considered performing elision conditionally on the length on the
> > elided part? I see the benefits of changing, let say,
>
> std::map<some<long, and, nested<type>>, std::string>
>
> > into
>
> std::map<[...], std::string>,
>
> > but for me,
>
> std::map<int, int>
>
> > is clearer than
>
> std::map<[...], int>.
>
> (see the other comments downthread from thread).
>
> I'm filing this reminder to take a look at tweaking this for gcc 9.
Trunk is on gcc 9 now. Confirming since this originally came from someone else,
and changing status to ASSIGNED since you're the assignee.
>
> Maybe only elide common items if there's "more than one thing" e.g. if it's
> a template itself, or is multiple args?
