https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858
--- Comment #6 from Mike Sharov <msharov at users dot sourceforge.net> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Nope, see the C++ standard: > > [ Note: A pointer to a const type can be the operand of a > delete-expression; Ok, I guess; you have to follow the standard, after all. But I would like to see the rationale for this, because it sure looks like a violation of const correctness. I certainly feel violated.
