https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85511
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 44011
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44011&action=edit
gcc8-pr85511.patch
IMNSHO no, so this patch does remove them. If we really wanted them, the fix
would be not to reuse the same builtin codes for the builtins, with 32 and 64
suffixes.
