https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> A port does not need maintenance only for that port, and its users, but also
> for GCC itself. All ports are a cost to _all_ GCC developers. If a port is
> not maintained it has to be removed.
Do you IBM guys have a hidden agenda to bury the left-overs of Freescale? ;-)
The SPE port has already been moved out of the way so I don't really see the
point in further hammering it like that; there are plenty of obsolete ports in
the tree that would have to removed before this one if the above criterion was
followed to the letter.
