https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > However, with so many lines of legacy code out there using bit-filed that
> > have
> > been proven to work, it doesn't make sense to revisit/modify them. Would it
> > be possible for gcc to provide a -Wbitfield-conversion flag in new releases
> > and make 39170 an enhancement (preferably high priority)?
>
> Seriously, I am not the "maintainer" of GCC diagnostics
That's David Malcolm; adding him on cc
