https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work| |7.3.0
Summary|[8 Regression] Large rodate |[8 Regression] Large rodate
|section increase in |section increase in
|465.tonto with r257233 |465.tonto with r254427
Known to fail| |8.0
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry I pointed to a wrong revision. With the mentioned revision and #c4
test-case I have:
$ nm good.o
$ nm bad.o
U free
U _gfortran_runtime_error_at
U memcpy
0000000000000c00 T __types_module_MOD___copy_types_module_Archive_type
0000000000000be0 T __types_module_MOD___copy_types_module_Atom_type
0000000000000b40 T __types_module_MOD___copy_types_module_Basis_type
0000000000000b20 T __types_module_MOD___copy_types_module_Buffer_type
...
Is it a regression or it's intentional?
