https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #30 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #26)
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, joe at mcknight dot de wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
> >
> > --- Comment #25 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-16 12:58:50 UTC ---
> > (In reply to comment #24)
> >
> > > Well, it confirmed that void_list_node is not used, but I can't
> > > reproduce this fact.
> >
> > Then how should we go on with this? As said, I can also only reproduce it
> > under
> > very special circumstances but unfortunately these were the default
> > circumstances for our compiler runs.
>
> You should try to debug this yourself then.
>
> > Can we use anything else to terminate the loop? Is there any other debug
> > output
> > that would be helpful for you?
>
> Well, try to figure out who creates that void_list_node clone.
>
> You can use !VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_VALUE (arg)) instead.
>
> Richard.
So, if the responsibility is on Joe to debug, does it make sense for you to
still be the assignee then?
