https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7) > See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00031.html -- I think > Kaushik > is still looking at this? Ah, ok. I do agree with your comment to use the *_2op_si pattern. Do you agree we could combine these patterns? If so, I could do that as a followon cleanup patch.