https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Serguei Kolos from comment #2) > If you read my original message through the end you should have noticed that > I have admitted that already. My question was different: > > Is it normal that the same code (seemingly bogus) compiles fine with > optimize tags and gives errors without them? That question might have been more appropriate on the gcc-help mailing list, not as a bug report. Anyway, as I said, the answer is yes. It's expected.
