https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84243
--- Comment #1 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- Hi, I do not have 'none-linux' platform at hand. Could you please show the output for the failing tests? Thanks, Igor > -----Original Message----- > From: jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 5:58 PM > To: itsim...@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [Bug testsuite/84243] New: [8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin- > 4.c at r257414 > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84243 > > Bug ID: 84243 > Summary: [8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c at > r257414 > Product: gcc > Version: 8.0 > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal > Priority: P3 > Component: testsuite > Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org > Reporter: jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org > CC: itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org > Target Milestone: --- > Target: x86-64-none-linux-gnu, aarch64-none-linux-gnu > > Hi, our bisect robot spotted a failure in gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-3.c, > gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c, after revision r257414 on > x86-64-none-linux-gnu, and c-c++-common/fcf-protection-6.c and > c-c++-common/fcf-protection-7.c on aarch64-none-linux.gnu. Would you > mind > taking a look? > > Your new tests will always FAIL on non-x86 targets (for example > aarch64-none-linux-gnu). Is dg-error really the right directive, that is a > guaranteed FAIL, I would expect a skip. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
