https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82086
--- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> --- (In reply to jsberg from comment #7) > As to why I think this is a bug (and why I think Intel's compiler is doing > the right thing), referencing the 2008 standard (N1830): In the F2018 DIS (N2146) the corresponding section is 13.11. It appears to have been heavily reorganized, but AFAICT from a first glance it is quite similar. E.g. > 10.11.3.2, paragraph 2: > > When the designator in the input record represents an array variable or a > variable of derived type, the effect is as if the variable represented were > expanded into a sequence of scalar list items, in the same way that formatted > input/output list items are expanded (9.6.3). is now 13.11.3.2, paragraph 2. > 10.11.3.3, paragraph 1: > > ... The r*c form is equivalent to r successive appearances of the constant c There's some change in wording here in 13.11.3.3, paragraph 1, explaining the r* form for multiple null values.
