https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55422
--- Comment #7 from cookevillain at yahoo dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > The first example is invalid C90 anyways: > t4.c:10:3: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wpedantic] I forgot to mention it in my previous comment: this remark has also been addressed byt the newer example. The only reason ff(0); was there to begin with was to avoid a warning that ff is not used (which is irrelevant to the case at hand but I wanted 'gcc is quiet' mean just that)
