https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84057
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Sth like the following works for example. Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c =================================================================== --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c (revision 257077) +++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c (working copy) @@ -660,14 +660,21 @@ unloop_loops (bitmap loop_closed_ssa_inv loops_to_unloop.release (); loops_to_unloop_nunroll.release (); - /* Remove edges in peeled copies. */ + /* Remove edges in peeled copies. Given remove_path removes dominated + regions we need to cope with removal of already removed paths. */ unsigned i; edge e; + auto_vec<int, 20> src_bbs; + src_bbs.reserve_exact (20); FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (edges_to_remove, i, e) - { - bool ok = remove_path (e, irred_invalidated, loop_closed_ssa_invalidated); - gcc_assert (ok); - } + src_bbs.quick_push (e->src->index); + FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (edges_to_remove, i, e) + if (BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, src_bbs[i])) + { + bool ok = remove_path (e, irred_invalidated, + loop_closed_ssa_invalidated); + gcc_assert (ok); + } edges_to_remove.release (); }