https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |lto, wrong-code
Target| |arm
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2018-01-22
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Host| |x86_64-linux
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
If you have two weak definitions it is undefined which one takes precedence.
If the C project variant (that gets removed?) is not weak the linker should
have
made it used. But this is only going to work if you build with a linker plugin
- so can you double check that (for example pass -fuse-linker-plugin to the
link step?).
In any case we'd need something like a testcase to confirm/investigate.
Please also specify the linker you are using.
I assume you are cross compiling from x86_64-linux?
