https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83888
Bug ID: 83888
Summary: [8 regression] new failures after r256639 on armhf
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As I mentioned in PR83836, r256639 introduced new regressions on
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf:
gcc.dg/vect/no-fast-math-vect16.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "using an in-order
\\(fold-left\\) reduction" 1 (found 0 times)
gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
"using an in-order \\(fold-left\\) reduction" 1 (found 0 times)
gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1 (found 0 times)
gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "using an in-order
\\(fold-left\\) reduction" 1 (found 0 times)
gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-6.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
(found 0 times)
Seen on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
--with-mode arm
--with-cpu cortex-a9
--with-fpu neon-fp16
