[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2017-12-15
   Target Milestone|---                         |8.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
or something similar (or should it walk the whole def for TREE_OVERFLOWs)?
Or shall this be caught earlier during SCEV computations?  Not taking this PR,
SCEV is not something I have much experience with.