https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83337
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The bug is pretty obvious:
compute_access_stride
does:
tree ref = DR_REF (dr);
tree scev_base = build_fold_addr_expr (ref);
tree scev = analyze_scalar_evolution (loop, scev_base);
scev = instantiate_scev (loop_preheader_edge (loop_nest), loop, scev);
for all drs, now obviously build_fold_addr_expr is not valid on bitfields.
Untested fix:
--- gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc.jj 2017-12-08 12:27:11.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc 2017-12-09 12:18:09.209977976 +0100
@@ -1291,6 +1291,30 @@ compute_access_stride (struct loop *loop
gcc_assert (loop == bb->loop_father);
tree ref = DR_REF (dr);
+ if (TREE_CODE (ref) == COMPONENT_REF
+ && DECL_BIT_FIELD (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1)))
+ {
+ /* We can't take address of bitfields. If the bitfield is at constant
+ offset from the start of the struct, just use address of the
+ struct, for analysis of the strides that shouldn't matter. */
+ if (!TREE_OPERAND (ref, 2)
+ || TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 2)) == INTEGER_CST)
+ ref = TREE_OPERAND (ref, 0);
+ /* Otherwise, if we have a bit field representative, use that. */
+ else if (DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1))
+ != NULL_TREE)
+ {
+ tree repr = DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1));
+ ref = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, TREE_TYPE (repr), TREE_OPERAND (ref, 0),
+ repr, TREE_OPERAND (ref, 2));
+ }
+ /* Otherwise punt. */
+ else
+ {
+ dr->aux = strides;
+ return;
+ }
+ }
tree scev_base = build_fold_addr_expr (ref);
tree scev = analyze_scalar_evolution (loop, scev_base);
scev = instantiate_scev (loop_preheader_edge (loop_nest), loop, scev);