https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79228
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed: now the compiler will prefer the library suffix.
Incidentally, why doesn't complex<T> have a constructor from __complex T?
