https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83053
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2017-11-19
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can't reproduce the ICE with the current top of trunk. My output is below.
Running GCC through Valgrind also doesn't show any unexpected errors. I do see
a ton of test suite failures with this build, though.
$ /opt/notnfs/msebor/build/gcc-git/gcc/gfortran -B
/opt/notnfs/msebor/build/gcc-git/gcc -O1 -S -Wall -Warray-bounds=1
/opt/notnfs/msebor/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_offset_1.f90
/opt/notnfs/msebor/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_offset_1.f90:65:16:
integer :: k
1
Warning: Unused variable ‘k’ declared at (1) [-Wunused-variable]
/opt/notnfs/msebor/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_offset_1.f90:129:0:
end function lower_sortable
Warning: ‘__result_lower_sortable’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
/opt/notnfs/msebor/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_offset_1.f90:121:0:
logical function lower_sortable( op1, op2 )
note: ‘__result_lower_sortable’ was declared here
