https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82784
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So the way it's used is correct ... but why bother with the do {...} while(0) in that case? It could just use {...} instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82784
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So the way it's used is correct ... but why bother with the do {...} while(0) in that case? It could just use {...} instead.