https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > I get > > gA%next(): 2 > gA%next(): 4 > gA%next(): 6 > > gAp%next(): 2 > gAp%next(): 4 > gAp%next(): 6 > > for 4.8 up to trunk (8.0). Not sure how this worked.