https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The rev. was supposed to be a no-op? I also guess so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The rev. was supposed to be a no-op? I also guess so.