https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> > GCJ has been removed from GCC 7. But on the other hand this isn't really so
> > much a java bug itself as it is an unwinding bug that java just happened to
> > be the one to tickle. So is it worth keeping this bug open?
>
> agreed it's an unwinder bug, I suppose we need a non-Java reproducer. As of
> Darwin11, nothing should be using the libgcc_s unwinder (and really it
> shouldn't be used for darwin10). The broken unwinder in the darwin9
> libgcc_s can't be easily fixed (44107) - and the resolution there is to
> update the installed lib.
>
> It's possible that we're going to struggle to get a fix unless/until we can
> make output compatible with the compact unwinder.
>
> We can leave this open, but as stated, someone should try to find a
> non-Java reproducer.
(just checking back, and for reference, bug 44107 was closed as WONTFIX)
