https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82618
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Or add a pattern for
(set (reg:DI 100)
(subreg:DI (minus:TI (reg/v:TI 90 [ x ])
(reg/v:TI 94 [ y ])) 8))
that combine would match and then reload that differently if not using SSE regs
and split it differently too.
