https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > Note, there is a small difference to pr78963 Should be 79863. Compiling the test with '-Wall -Wextra -fcheck=all -Ofast -m32 -fsanitize=address' gives pr79864.f90:4:0: si = ssi Warning: 'ssi.dim[0].ubound' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] pr79864.f90:2:0: integer(kind=1), allocatable :: ssi(:) note: 'ssi.dim[0].ubound' was declared here pr79864.f90:4:0: si = ssi Warning: 'ssi.dim[0].lbound' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] pr79864.f90:2:0: integer(kind=1), allocatable :: ssi(:) note: 'ssi.dim[0].lbound' was declared here pr79864.f90:4:0: si = ssi Warning: 'si.dim[0].ubound' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] pr79864.f90:1:0: integer, allocatable :: si(:) note: 'si.dim[0].ubound' was declared here pr79864.f90:4:0: si = ssi Warning: 'si.dim[0].lbound' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] pr79864.f90:1:0: integer, allocatable :: si(:) note: 'si.dim[0].lbound' was declared here unless the patch in pr52162 comment 8 is applied. Note that I don't see any segfault at run time.
